TAOstatus

sn104Inference & ComputeElevated risk66Avoid20

TaoStatus subnet coordinates three distinct roles, miner, validator, and protocol, around a single objective: allowing miners to contribute spare large-language-model (LLM) API capacity to a shared pool, and rewarding them on-chain in proportion to how reliably that capacity is actually used.

taostatus/taostatus-subnet· pushed 1d ago emissions paused reg. open

Emission

paused on chain

Alpha

0.0185

τ · mcap 59.3K

Top-slot payout

—

τ per winning epoch · live

Worth mining TAOstatus?

model the marginal economics before you burn the registration fee — live chain numbers, your assumptions

Your rig

drag to model your setup

Hardware cost$2,400

Electricity$3.0/day

Skill multiplier1.20× avg miner

Registration burn 0.500 τ

Active miners (live) 2

Pool depth 25,874 τ

Share model: 1/active × skill — an approximation; real share follows the subnet's own scoring.

Verdict

expected marginal economics for one more miner

Not worth it

Est. share

50.0

% of epoch emission

Net / day

$-3.00

after slippage + power

Monthly

$-90.00

-3.6% ROI / mo

Break-even

—

0% sell slippage

Registration burn is 0.500 TAO — price of admission is non-trivial.
This subnet has no on-chain emissions right now — there is nothing to mine until emissions start.
Expected net cash flow does not cover opex at current emission share estimates.

Hardware, power and skill are your assumptions — everything else (emission, alpha price, pool depth, registration burn, active-miner competition) is read live from subtensor. Paused or zero-emission subnets will always model to “not worth it” because there is genuinely nothing to mine.