Which races deserve suspicion?
Every score here is computed from live chain evidence only — emission concentration from the Emission map, repo dormancy from the registered repo's real GitHub pushes, and on-chain emission status. Signals that would need metagraph or transfer history are not modeled, not invented.
Owner self-mining, validator oligopoly and funding-graph checks require metagraph and transfer history taonets does not ingest yet — those signals are intentionally absent rather than fabricated. Each score links to the exact chain storage it came from.
Risk vs emission
bubble size = daily emission · hover for subnet · log scale
Flagged subnets
highest risk from live chain evidence — each claim links to its storage map
Cleanest races
low risk, high hygiene
Evidence, not accusation
Concentration, dormancy and paused emissions are facts about incentives, not accusations of fraud: a dominant uid may simply be the best miner. Every subscore cites the exact chain read behind it, so you can verify each number yourself.